Rumors of Trump’s demise are, once again, greatly exaggerated

  • The “experts” are once again prematurely declaring President Trump’s political demise.
  • By now, they should respect his resilience more and the polls a lot less.
  • Trump is safe as long as his political opponents remain even weaker.

Jake Novak

President Donald Trump

Welcome to the Donald Trump status reality check for dummies, part 276.

It seems like the established political and punditry world needs many frequent reminders about President Trump’s resilience every time he goes through a wounding incident like he is now with the beating he’s taking over his response to the violent protests in Charlottesville last weekend.

So here are the several reasons why President Trump is simply down, but not out in any permanent sense. There are four key things to remember:

(Note: None of the points below are excuses for President Trump. They simply explain why he’s not as vulnerable as many people think he is.)

1) Trump wins when he loses

It may seem like all Americans are at least frustrated that President Trump often shoots himself in the foot with unnecessary comments and tweets. But this also exemplifies Trump’s fighting nature that so many voters clearly like. Many conservatives feel like they tried “nice” before with people like Presidents George H.W. and George W. Bush, and GOP presidential nominees John McCain and Mitt Romney, but that still resulted in no real reduction in condemnation and bile from the left.

For better or for worse, and to the repeated horror of the Bushes, McCains, and Romneys, Trump isn’t playing nice. And for every moderate or casual Trump-leaner he may lose by fighting, he could easily be gaining the more fervent support from his base.

One major Trump donor even told CNBC Friday that the president is “being bullied” over this Charlottesville controversy. That response should tell you something about how President Trump’s supporters are responding to events playing out this week.

2) The stock selloff fake out

Trump’s voter base is hardly represented by Wall Street or major corporate interests. Much more important to the voters Trump needs to at least tacitly back him are the broader economic numbers. And, thanks to President Trump or not, those numbers are stellar. Unemployment is at a 16-year low, and the consumer sentiment levels are at near record highs. With fewer and fewer Americans even owning stocks, the fate of the stock market is hardly a top priority in politics for someone like President Trump who already proved he doesn’t need Wall Street’s support to win the White House.

3) Poll position

It seems crazy to have remind anyone of how we shouldn’t rely on the accuracy of polls after they just about all got the 2016 election so wrong.

But in case anyone is really convinced by all those record low approval numbers for President Trump, take them with this added grain of salt: His supporters may be skewing the numbers by avoiding polls right now. It may sound crazy, but even Psychology Today noted the work of Professor Raymond La Raja who argues that people holding perceived unique political views are more likely to withdraw from political discussions and public declarations for candidates even in anonymous polls in order to avoid the personal costs of being exposed.

In other words, just about every poll on President Trump is probably under counting his support.

4) The “other teams” are even weaker

Another key fact too many pro-Trump and anti-Trump Americans also don’t get is that none of this means Trump is bulletproof. But American politics is almost always about a two team game. And until someone from the other team, (the Democrats), really emerges as a true electoral challenge to President Trump, a lot of this won’t stick. The same goes for the establishment Republicans, who are still electorally dead in the water after two bruising defeats in the 2008 and 2012 general election to Barack Obama and an even more embarrassing and clear loss to Trump in the 2016 primaries. When people like Senators McCain, Lindsey Graham, Bob Corker, et al criticize him, it means very little.

Read More

Get a Roku and watch real news, as are getting ready to relaunch our channel

Add our Roku channel!

onald trump
dnald trump
doald trump
donld trump
donad trump
donal trump
donald rump
donald tump
donald trmp
donald trup
donald trum
ddonald trump
doonald trump
donnald trump
donaald trump
donalld trump
donaldd trump
donald ttrump
donald trrump
donald truump
donald trummp
donald trumpp
odnald trump
dnoald trump
doanld trump
donlad trump
donadl trump
donal dtrump
donald rtump
donald turmp
donald trmup
donald trupm
donaldtrump
sonald trump
eonald trump
ronald trump
fonald trump
conald trump
xonald trump
dinald trump
d9nald trump
d0nald trump
dpnald trump
dlnald trump
dknald trump
dobald trump
dohald trump
dojald trump
domald trump
donqld trump
donwld trump
donsld trump
donxld trump
donzld trump
donakd trump
donaod trump
donapd trump
donals trump
donale trump
donalr trump
donalf trump
donalc trump
donalx trump
donald rrump
donald 5rump
donald 6rump
donald yrump
donald hrump
donald grump
donald frump
donald teump
donald t4ump
donald t5ump
donald ttump
donald tgump
donald tfump
donald tdump
donald trymp
donald tr7mp
donald tr8mp
donald trimp
donald trkmp
donald trjmp
donald trhmp
donald trunp
donald trujp
donald trukp
donald trumo
donald trum0
donald truml
sdonald trump
dsonald trump
edonald trump
deonald trump
rdonald trump
dronald trump
fdonald trump
dfonald trump
cdonald trump
dconald trump
xdonald trump
dxonald trump
dionald trump
doinald trump
d9onald trump
do9nald trump
d0onald trump
do0nald trump
dponald trump
dopnald trump
dlonald trump
dolnald trump
dkonald trump
doknald trump
dobnald trump
donbald trump
dohnald trump
donhald trump
dojnald trump
donjald trump
domnald trump
donmald trump
donqald trump
donaqld trump
donwald trump
donawld trump
donsald trump
donasld trump
donxald trump
donaxld trump
donzald trump
donazld trump
donakld trump
donalkd trump
donaold trump
donalod trump
donapld trump
donalpd trump
donalsd trump
donalds trump
donaled trump
donalde trump
donalrd trump
donaldr trump
donalfd trump
donaldf trump
donalcd trump
donaldc trump
donalxd trump
donaldx trump
donald rtrump
donald trrump
donald 5trump
donald t5rump
donald 6trump
donald t6rump
donald ytrump
donald tyrump
donald htrump
donald thrump
donald gtrump
donald tgrump
donald ftrump
donald tfrump
donald terump
donald treump
donald t4rump
donald tr4ump
donald t5rump
donald tr5ump
donald ttrump
donald trtump
donald tgrump
donald trgump
donald tfrump
donald trfump
donald tdrump
donald trdump
donald tryump
donald truymp
donald tr7ump
donald tru7mp
donald tr8ump
donald tru8mp
donald triump
donald truimp
donald trkump
donald trukmp
donald trjump
donald trujmp
donald trhump
donald truhmp
donald trunmp
donald trumnp
donald trujmp
donald trumjp
donald trukmp
donald trumkp
donald trumop
donald trumpo
donald trum0p
donald trump0
donald trumlp
donald trumpl

UN Boss Urges Schools to Promote Wealth Redistribution & Control

Written by  Alex Newman

From FreedomProject Media:

In an interview with an arm of the official United Nations propaganda machine, UN General Assembly President Peter Thomson (shown) said he is working with governments worldwide to indoctrinate children into supporting the totalitarian “Agenda 2030” produced by the dictators club. Indeed, the school curricula in every country must incorporate the UN’s so-called “Sustainable Development Goals,” or SDGs, he explained.

For those who are still unfamiliar with the totalitarian UN “Agenda 2030,” it’s essentially a recipe for global socialism and technocracy. It calls for international wealth redistribution, total government control over economic production, indoctrination of children, and more. The scheme vows to “transform our world” and “leave no one behind.” Top UN leaders call it the “Declaration of Interdependence.”

Brutal dictators and mass-murderers from around the world — socialists, communists, Islamists, and more — fervently endorsed it. And the Communist Chinese regime, which has murdered more people than any other government in human history, boasted through its propaganda organs of its “crucial role” in creating the UN master plan for humanity.

But now, the children have to be brought on board. Speaking to Africa Renewal, a project of the Africa Section of the UN Department of Public Information, UN boss Thomson highlighted everything he has done to promote the UN’s SDGs around the world. Schools, in particular, are at the center of it, with children described in the document as “critical agents of change.”

To read the rest of the article, click here.

Rockefeller Funded World Government makes many of the US decisions

Democrats move to formally censure Trump over Charlottesville

https://i.imgflip.com/1i4uzz.jpg

House Democrats are introducing a formal resolution to denounce President Donald Trump for saying that “both sides” are to blame for a violent encounter between white supremacists and neo-Nazis and the activists who showed up to protest them.

While the censure is unlikely to see traction in the GOP-led House, it serves as a rebuke to Trump and mirrors some of the Republican criticism the president has faced for his remarks.

“A president of the United States cannot support neo-Nazis. It’s just beyond the pale,” said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., a member of the House Judiciary Committee. “I hope Republicans who have expressed outrage with what he said put their money where their mouth is.”

Just three Democrats have signed onto the measure, but Nadler says he expects more to follow.

 

With this tactic, Democrats are taking a page from Republicans who frequently filed censure resolutions against President Barack Obama and members of his administration. Most died on the vine, but the Republican-controlled House of Representatives in 2012 voted to censure then-Attorney General Eric Holder for his role in the botched Fast and Furious gun-running operation into Mexico.

A number of lawmakers also introduced censures against Bill Clinton over his affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky and resolutions were filed against George W. Bush for authorizing a no-warrant domestic surveillance program.

One president was formally censured: President Andrew Jackson in 1834 was admonished by the Senate for refusing to turn over documents that lawmakers had requested.

The current resolution calls for lawmakers to “censure and condemn” Trump for what it calls an “inadequate” response to the violence on Saturday in Charlottesville, Va.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Read More

In America Propaganda Has Vanquished Truth

Paul Craig Roberts

https://i0.wp.com/www.wakingtimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/tv-head-propaganda-1.png

In Durham, North Carolina, the seat of Duke University, a gang of largely white males destroyed public property by pulling down a statue of a Confederate soldier. Perhaps they took their cue from the neo-Nazis installed in Ukraine by Obama and Hillary following the US-engineered coup that overthrew the elected democratic government. The first thing the new Obama-installed neo-Nazi regime did was to pull down all the Soviet war memorials of the liberation of Ukraine from Nazi Germany. The neo-Nazis who pulled down the war memorials were the descendants of the Ukrainians who fought for Nazi Germany. These neo-Nazis comprise the government of the “democracy” that Obama and Hillary brought to the Ukraine and is the government that the US government and its European vassals support.

What did the destruction of public property in Durham achieve, and where were the police?

What the films of the event reveal is a collection of crazed white people, mainly white men, kicking and spitting at a bronze statue and jumping back as if the statue were going to strike back. It was a display of ignorant psychopathic hatred.

Where did this hatred come from and why was it directed at a statue? To the ignorant gangsters, most likely Duke University students, the destroyed statue is a symbol of slavery.

This ignorant association between a Confederale soldier and slavery contradicts all known history. Slavery in the Southern states was confined to large argicultural tracts known as plantations. Slaves were the agricultural workforce. This institution long predated the Confederacy and the United States itself. It was an inherited institution from the time that the New World was colonized by European economic interests. Slaves were not a Southern invention. They were brought in long prior to the Declaration of Independence, because there were resources to be exploited but no work force.

The first slaves were white slaves, but they died like flies from malaria and yellow fevor. Next indigenious Americans (“Indians”) were used as slaves, but they would not work. Then it was discovered that some Africans had immunity to malaria and resistance to yellow fever, and finally a work force was located. The slaves were purchased from the African tribes that annually conducted warfare between themselves, the booty of which was slaves. Socialist historians, such as Karl Polanyi, the Jewish brother of my Jewish Oxford professor, the distinguished physical chemist and philosopher Michael Polanyi, to whom my first book is dedicated, wrote detailed and exacting histories of the African slave trade conducted by black Africans.

Confederate soldiers did not own slaves, and as every honest historian knows, they were not fighting for slavery. They were fighting, because their country had been invaded.

The Confederacy was not their country any more than the United States had been. Their country was their state. In those days people’s loyalty was to their state. They thought of their state as their country. To their minds, the United States was something like the EU is to the French, Italians, Dutch, British, etc. The French still think of themselves as French, not as EU.

Remember, when Robert E. Lee was offered command of the Union Army, he declined on the grounds that he could not bring war to his own country, by which he meant Virginia.

Lee’s army was the Army of Northern Virginia.

As President Lincoln said over and over, the war is not about slavery. It is about “preserving the union,” that is, the empire. If the South were permitted to separate, it would mean that there would be two countries competing for the vast lands to the west of the Mississippi River. The budding empire in Washington did not want any such competition.

If the South were permitted to seperate, the North would lose its market for its relatively high priced manufactured goods that it hoped to sell to the South by placing a tariff against the cheaper British goods.

The South figured, correctly, that it would be doubly hit. Higher prices from the North and retaliatory tariffs from the British on its cotton exports.

This economic conflict between the North and South went on for a long time before it provoked secession. The left-wing American Historian, Charles Beard, explains the so-called “Civil War” in the economic terms that provoked it. It had nothing whatsoever to do with slavery.

The very designation, “Civil War,” is a lie. A civil war is when two sides fight for control of the government. The South was not fighting for control of the US government. It was fighting, because the North had invaded.

Lincoln did not free the slaves. Moreover, had Lincoln not been assassinated, his plan was to send the blacks, whom he regarded as inferior to whites, back to Africa. This is not a “conspiracy theory.” It is the documented fact. It is totally impossible to refute this documented fact.

The Emancipation Proclamation was propaganda. It had two purposes: one was to shut up the abolitionists. The other was to promote a slave rebellion in the Southern states that would draw Confederate troops out of the front lines to protect the women and children at home. As Lincoln’s own Secretary of State, William H. Seward, said, we have freed the slaves where we have no jurisdiction and left them in slavery where we have jusistiction. Seward’s exact words: “We show our sympathy with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them and holding them in bondage where we can set them free.”

The left-wing historian Richard Hofstadter ridiculed Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation for freeing only the slaves over which Lincoln had no power.

Lincoln’s purpose was not to free slaves but to provoke the slave rape of Southern women and murder of Southern children that would pull the Southern troops his generals could not defeat off the front lines and impel them home to protect their families from Lincoln’s slave revolt.

But the slaves did not revolt even though there was no one there to conrol them but women and children. So what kind of oppression was this?

Lincoln issued the proclamation intended to produce a slave rebellion because he had run through countless generals, and although the Union army in its engagements with Robert E. Lee always outnumbered the Southerns by two or three to one, and sometimes more, the Army of Northern Virginia did not lose a battle for the first two years of the War. If the South had had more people, a number of Southern battle victories would have ended in the capture of Washington and the end of the war. But the South never had the number of soldiers sufficient to have a reserve to capitalize on its military victories. In contrast, the North had an endless supply of immigrants from Ireland, most of whom died for the American Empire.

Oppositon to the war in the North was high. Lincoln had to arrest and imprison 300 northern newspaper owners and editors and exile a US Congressman.

Slavery was an inherited institution, not a Southern construct. Slavery would have gradually disappeared as immigrants into the South begin forming a work force and the over-cultivated plantation lands begin losing their fertility. Slavery existed as long as it did because new immigrants, instead of becoming a local work force, moved west, occupied Indian land and became independent farmers.

Of course, the abolitionist created all the hatred of the South that they possibly could. Indeed, during my entire life, lived almost exclusively outside the South, I have observed the liberals foment racial hatred of blacks toward whites, and I have watched feminists foment gender hatred of women toward men. Hatred is the great cause of the liberals. It is what defines them.

The stupid liberals have sowed social enmity between races and genders. The destruction of America will be the result.

Perhaps we will fall apart, occupied in racial and gender warfare, before the Russians and Chinese have to blow us off the face of the earth.

Do you have basic knowledge on how to survive any crisis?

If Google and Facebook are not regulated, their politically-motivated censorship will drive America to open warfare in the streets

Image: If Google and Facebook are not regulated, their politically-motivated censorship will drive America to open warfare in the streets

(Natural News) The violence on America’s streets must end, and that means the overt censorship of conservative voices by Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter must also end. It is time to regulate internet gatekeepers and outlaw their politically-motivated censorship of anyone who doesn’t conform to the obedient cult-like demands of the intolerant Left.

The events over the past few days have proven beyond any doubt that the bias, distortions and lies of the left-wing media are far more dangerous to America than any violent individual whacko. The very same media that celebrated President Obama following every outbreak of Black Lives Matter violence in America somehow condemns Trump when a mentally ill individual with a history of psychiatric medications goes off the deep end and commits murder. Yet to hear the left-wing media tell the story, somehow it’s all Trump’s fault.

“Political totalitarianism is coming to America, and it is being ushered in not by government thugs in jackboots but by progressive activists and their allies in Silicon Valley,” warns Lifezette.com. “In a chilling oped published in The New York Times on July 14, Lisa Feldman Barrett, a professor of psychology at Northeastern University, argued that so-called “hate speech” is the same thing as physical violence because it may possibly cause emotionally fragile individuals stress — and should be made illegal.”

The echo chamber of the illogical, irrational and enraged Left — the liberal mob — is magnified by the selective censorship of internet gatekeepers like Google and Facebook, all of which are engaged in the most outrageous distortions and censorship imaginable, deliberately silencing all conservative voices while amplifying left-wing channels and (fake) news sources, no matter how dishonest or hypocritical they are. This is all part of a deliberate scheme to silence open debate and suppress the voices of conservatives, heterosexuals, White people or Christians in order to favor lunatic left-wing culture that’s rooted in delusional thinking, anti-science “biology” and intense racism, bigotry and hatred toward anyone who doesn’t bow down to their totalitarianism cult.

As Paul Craig Roberts wisely explains:

The liberal/progressive/left along with the media has abandoned the working class for Identity Politics. Identity Politics teaches that women, blacks, and homosexuals are all victims of white heterosexual males who are characterized as the victimizer class, that is, those who victimize others.  The doctrine delegitimizes white heterosexual males in the same way that Nazi doctrine delegitimizes Jews and communist doctrine delegitimizes capitalists. There is no difference.

The liberal/progressive/left asserts that everyone knows that Robert E. Lee was an evil racist who fought for slavery and everyone who wants to protect his statue is obviously the same. Such people deserve no voice, no vote. They must be excluded from public discussion.

Imagine saying this about any other group, especially women, blacks, and homosexuals. How is it possible for the liberal/progressive/left to really believe that they are oppressed by powerful white male heterosexuals when they can demonize white males at will and prevent any backtalk?

As another example of the kind of intellectual dishonesty and seething hatred now routinely spouted by the Left — and amplified by Google and Facebook — consider the rantings of former Democratic congresswoman Donna Edwards, as reported by PJ Media:

Donna Edwards, a former Democratic congresswoman and now MSNBC contributor, said that Heather Hayer was run over and killed at the Charlottesville counter-protest “on behalf of President Trump.”

This wildly dishonest, hate-filled equating of President Trump with the actions of a medicated, insane Hitler supporter is given prominence and credibility by Google and Facebook, while all independent media voices that point out the insanity and danger of the Left’s baseless accusations are silenced, penalized or banned altogether. Censorship is totally out of control across the tech giants of America, and they are now run like cults where merely asking reasonable questions gets you censored.

As brilliantly explained by Robert Gore at Straight Line Logic:

Repression is when you get shot for telling the truth. Totalitarianism is when you get shot for asking questions.

You can have equal treatment or preferential treatment, but you can’t have both… A cherished goal of the diversity drones is to get the unfavored group to applaud not just the drones’ enlightened moral status, but to pretend that the favored group does just as good a job as the unfavored one, and that diversity of secondary traits (but not, evidently, diversity of thought) itself confers a benefit. It’s a subset of an “optics” problem that besets the entire redistributive racket: how do you get unfavored producers not just to go along with the scam and keep producing unearned benefits for the racketeers and redistributees, but to pretend they like it?

Indeed, it is the now-systematic censorship of the voices of reason — the independent media — that poses the greatest danger to peace and stability in this country. It appears that Google, Facebook and Twitter are deliberately trying to plunge America into a civil war so that they can blame Trump for the carnage. “Google not only has difficulty empathizing with other points of view — it is also actively trying to suppress them,” reports Lifezette.com. “People familiar with the process have told reporters recently that YouTube, a subsidiary of Google, is also laboring to cleanse its platform of alternative voices that challenge the mainstream liberal narrative. The social media video-sharing site has in the past few months systematically demonetized videos of right-wing commenters and journalists, such as Infowars editor-at-large Paul Joseph Watson and former Rebel Media reporter Lauren Southern.”

Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter must be regulated to protect “content neutrality”

That’s why it’s time to regulate internet monopolists and enact a “content neutrality” law that bars large internet corporations from selectively silencing websites and video channels they don’t like for purely political reasons.

My video explains more, revealing why censorship will lead America toward civil war, and if there is a civil war, the offices of Google and Facebook will most almost certainly be targeted first by pro-America forces seeking to end the tyranny and censorship of the Left that’s tearing this country apart. Join the March on Google this Saturday, August 19th, to protest Google censorship and oppression.

To overcome censorship, read Censored.news daily. Use GoodGopher.com as your news search engine, and stop using Google and Facebook altogether. (They’re mostly just front-ends for the NSA anyway. They exist to spy on you while you voluntarily hand over all your most sensitive data, including search phrases, the identities of all your friends, your daily habits and whereabouts, etc.)

Never get caught empty handed!

Signs of Charlottesville ‘white supremacist’ rally being a false flag

Last weekend, a planned “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, to protest the removal of Confederate monuments from public spaces, descended into violence when what the MSM describe as “white supremacists” clashed with counter-protesters, forcing the city to declare a state of emergency.

A white man named James Alex Fields, Jr. rammed his car into a group of counter-demonstrators, killing a liberal, Heather Heyer, and injuring 19. Fields is in police custody, denied bond, and charged with one count of second-degree murder, three counts of malicious wounding, failure to stop for an accident involving a death, and hit-and-run.

Evidence is mounting that the rally and violence may have been staged, although the car crashing into protesters was very real, as you can see in this video:

https://videopress.com/embed/xjuoUdco?hd=0&autoPlay=0&permalink=0&loop=0

If the rally was staged, what happened in Charlottesville was a false flag — a traumatic public event staged by government to advance its covert agenda. However, the government is not the Trump administration, but the deep state that means to damage, discredit and remove President Trump by aligning him with the rally’s alleged white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

Here’s the evidence:

(1) The White Supremacist Leader

Incredibly, the leader of what the MSM call the rally’s “white supremacist Nazis” is a former avid Obama supporter and Occupy Wall Street protester named Jason Kessler, who supposedly did a 180° reversal and became a Trump supporter.

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center:

“Rumors abound on white nationalist forums that Kessler’s ideological pedigree before 2016 was less than pure and seem to point to involvement in the Occupy movement and past support for President Obama.

At one recent speech in favor of Charlottesville’s status as a sanctuary city, Kessler live-streamed himself as an attendee questioned him and apologized for an undisclosed spat during Kessler’s apparent involvement with Occupy. Kessler appeared visibly perturbed by the woman’s presence and reminders of their past association….

Regardless of Kessler’s past politics, the rightward shift in his views was first put on display in November, 2016 when his tirade against [Vice-Mayor of Charlottesville] Wes Bellamy began.”

In 2011, Jason Kessler worked for CNN as an “assignment editor”, but we are to believe that now he’s a neo-Nazi white supremacist?

(2) Unite the Right

If Jason Kessler, the leader of Unite the Right, is suspect, what about his group?

There is buzz on the Internet that Unite the Right is a George Soros-funded “honeypot psyop” of Antifa goons disguised as Nazis.

InfoWars‘ Alex Jones observed that the KKK protesters at Charlottesville actually were Jewish actors who looked like the cast of the TV sitcom Seinfeld. Jones said:

“Nothing against Jews in general, but they are leftist Jews that want to create this clash and they go dress up as Nazis. I have footage in Austin — we’re going to find it somewhere here at the office — where it literally looks like cast of ‘Seinfeld’ or like Howard Stern in a Nazi outfit. They all look like Howard Stern. They almost got like little curly hair down, and they’re just up there heiling Hitler. You can tell they are totally uncomfortable, they are totally scared and it’s all just meant to create the clash.”

Here’s a video of the Charlottesville rally of “white supremacists” carrying flaming torches, shouting “We’re standing up for our rights! We’re proud to be white! White lives matter!”, followed by screenshots I took from the video of “white supremacists” who look like stereotypical Jews.

(3) Crisis Actors

Investigative journalist and founder/editor-in-chief of Disobedient Media William Craddick @williamcraddick tweets:

“There were provocateurs on both sides of the crowd fomenting violence and creating justification for martial law.”

How many of the protesters, on either side, are real?

We know there are “public relations” firms that solicit actors for events, including rallies and protests. Below is a Craig’s List ad by Crowds on Demand — a Los Angeles public relations firm — soliciting “actors and photographers” in Charlotte, NC, to “participate” in “events”:

See also:

(4) The Driver

Here is what we are told about James Alex Fields, Jr., 20, the driver of the car that plowed into the crowd, killing Heather Heyer and injuring others (Heavy.com):

  • Fields recently moved to Maumee, Ohio, from Kentucky.
  • A security officer for Securitas Security Services USA who “performed his duties satisfactorily,” Fields was on previously requested vacation time when he attended the rally. After he was arrested, Securitas promptly fired him on Monday, August 14.
  • An uncle, under the condition of anonymity, told The Washington Post that Fields was raised by his paraplegic mom after his dad was killed by a drunk driver just a few months after Fields was born.
  • Fields has no criminal history. However, according to the AP, his mother had called 911 twice in the past, telling officers that he had beaten her.
  • High school teacher Derek Weimer said Fields had been diagnosed with schizophrenia and was on anti-psychotic medication. Weimer also said Fields “really bought into this white supremacist thing. He was very big into Nazism. He really had a fondness for Adolf Hitler.”
  • The car that rammed into the crowd in Charlottesville, a gray 2010 Dodge Challenger, was registered in Fields’ name.
  • Charlottesville Police Chief, Al Thomas, said the crash was premeditated.

However, according to Ruby Henley of Investment Watch Blog (IWB), citing Tweeter “Whitehouse Plumber” @rharrisonfries (who identifies himself as a retired television broadcast manager and U.S. Navy), James A. Fields “was a supporter of Hillary Clinton and a member of Antifa funded by George Soros.”

More confusing still, according to former NSA operative Jim Stone, James Alex Fields Jr. is not who the MSM say he is:

“‘James Alex Fields Jr’ – supposedly of Maumee, OH – doesn’t turn up when you search his name on Intelius. Oh, plenty of James A Fields exist, but none 20 years old from OH (or VA or anywhere else in the USA).”

Using the people search engine Spokeo, I found there are 5,149 people named “James Fields” in the United States:

  • 365 “James Fields” in Ohio, none of whom is a “James A. Fields,” age 20. In fact Ohio has no 2o-year-old “James Fields”.
  • 342 “James Fields” in Kentucky, none of whom is a “James A. Fields,” age 20. Nor does Kentucky have any 2o-year-old “James Fields”.

Stone claims that the man who actually crashed the car is “a seasoned military veteran” named James G. Field, age 32, and that the name of “the patsy” is actually James Bloom. Indeed, according to The Blade, the name of the paraplegic mother of “James A. Fields, Jr.” is Samantha Bloom, of Florence, Kentucky.

Spokeo says there is a “Samantha Lea Bloom,” aka Samantha Meyer, 49, whose most recent address is in Maumee, Ohio, and who had lived in Florence, Kentucky, and Silver Grove, Kentucky. Spokeo has no family members for Samantha Bloom. However, when she was in Silver Grove, she lived with a “James Meyer” (could this be “James A. Fields, Jr.”?)

Below are side-by-side pics of the driver in the car (screenshot taken from a video of Charlottesville), James Alex Fields Jr. (who Stone says is really named James Bloom), and James Field, 32.

Compare the side of the face and the mouth of the three men. To me, James Field, 32, more resembles the driver.

(5) The Police

Charlottesville police were told by the mayor to stand down. Trial lawyer Robert Barnes @Barnes_Law, referring to a tweet by ACLU of Virginia, tweeted that:

ACLU confirms that police were given stand-down order. This invited the violence the city used to shut down a court-permitted protest.”

VDare reports:

“Antifa,” the openly communist, anti-white and violent thugs who exist solely to attack European-Americans, were out in force in the city, using the cowardly tactics they specialize in: spraying demonstrators with mace, throwing bottles and bricks, and attacking people with weapons (including a homemade flamethrower).

It is quite true, as VDARE.com reported, that the police did not protect [Unite the Right] demonstrators from Antifa and did little to prevent confrontations. Attendees of the demonstration, rather than walking a clear path to the park, were instead forced to walk through a line of screaming protesters….

Then activists, totally unprotected by police, were deliberately funneled into a gauntlet of attacking Communists, in a kind of Kill Zone. Injuries on both sides were predictable….

All of this occurred after a “state of emergency” had been declared and demonstrations were supposed to have been halted….

Violence did not just “break out” at Unite The Right. Attendees were attacked—by Leftists and by the police. They worked together as seamlessly as if they had common leadership.

H/t Jim Fetzer, John Molloy, FOTM‘s DCG, josephbc69, lophatt and maziel.

See also:

~Eowyn