Media Mind Control – The MSM Has Become Single Most Dangerous Institution In America As They Incite More Protests In The Streets

mind-control-in-america.jpg

By Susan Duclos – All News PipeLine

Distrust of the mainstream media has reached historic lows as polling organizations across the board show that an overwhelming majority of Americans do not trust the MSM to “fact check,” according to Rasmussen. The media is in the bottom four in institutions trusted by Americans according to Gallup. Emerson just found that Americans trust the Trump administration more than the media.

MEDIA TRIES TO HOLD ON TO THE DWINDLING SLEEPING MASSES THAT STILL TRUST THEM

An under-reported recent survey from PredictWise/Pollfish Poll finds that he New York Times and Washington Post has become a “safe space” for Clinton voters, a place to go to see all the Trump bashing they can handle, with Trump voters distrusting both those outlets far more than Clinton voters distrust Fox News.

Media gets interesting with massive polarization over New York Times, Washington Post, and Fox News. The New York Times and Washington Post both have high favorability from Clinton voters: +47 and +50 respectively, and low favorability among Trump voters: -19 and -14 respectively. But, Fox News is not equal and opposite. Slightly lower favorability among Trump voters with +37 and actually +11 from Clinton voters.

NYTWAPOFOXT-C.png

That goes a long way towards explaining how the NYT managed to have 31 anti-Trump articles in a single issue and the constant Trump bashing that can be seen every single day on the front page of Washington Post’s home website page.

Lest anyone think I am exaggerating, just look at the beginning of one of Wapo’s most recent of breathless Trump pieces….. about his “awkward handshakes.”

(Peter Stevenson/The Washington Post)We know President Trump is concerned with appearances – especially when he’s on television, or in front of news photographers or large crowds. We also know that President Trump is concerned with hands – how large they are, how strong they are – just look at them! Whether it’s just habit, or a way of asserting his power, Trump has a habit of pulling forcefully on the hand he’s shaking. Trump even took time out to compliment Abe’s “strong hands” – or maybe he was just referencing his own.

HanshakeIsMajorNEWSNow.jpg

Yes ladies and gentlemen, Trump’s handshake, according to Wapo, is now worthy of headline news. That isn’t The Onion, or any other satire site, it is a major mainstream media source where Clinton voters, Democrats, and progressive liberals, go to get their “safe space” news.

DANGEROUS MEDIA MIND CONTROL

If all their antics were as amusing as the example shown above, we could sit and watch in pity as they race to their “glorious suicide” as the Daily Wire dubs it, but in between their absurd fixation on Trump’s hands, and hair and tweets, they are “reporting” in a manner that is instigating progressive websites to use certain buzzwords and phrases, that are increasingly dangerous, in order to control the minds of the sleeping masses that still trust them.

We have already shown how they are legitimizing violence against Trump supporters, but today we see another clear example of direct attempts at mind control.

It appears that to the mainstream media, law enforcement actually enforcing the law, is something the MSM is telling their readers to frown upon and to take to the streets to protest, which of course, they have.

NYT headlines with “Reports of Raids Have Immigrants Bracing for Enforcement Surge,” while Wapo headlines with “Federal agents conduct immigration enforcement raids in at least six states.”

A dog whistle, so their foaming at the mouth dwindling audience would run after the stick after being ordered to “fetch!”

The predictable reaction, exactly what they were directing followers to do by reporting that law enforcement was actually doing its job (GASP!),  followed immediately, with liberal bloggers across the board screaming “Deportation Squads,” and “Trump Deportation Regime,” and “Deportation Force,” and “massive Deportation Raids“.

Nevermind the fact that ICE has asserted these raids were “planned long in advance” and had nothing to do with Trump’s order, that is just a side note.

Following the predictable pattern the MSM has used their dangerous mind control methods to instigate over the last two years…… PROTESTS in the street, which was what the whole thing was meant to cause to begin with.

Protests erupt in New York City and Los Angeles over immigration raids, The Week reports.

IllegalAliensNOTUndocImmigrants.jpg

Note how they prefer the term “undocumented” rather than admitted they are people in the U.S. illegally, therefore they are illegal aliens. They are not citizens, nor law abiding because if they were law abiding, they wouldn’t have broken the law by being in America ILLEGALLY!

I digress…. the point being the MSM deliberately made a big deal over law enforcement doing their jobs, to incite their readers and to get progressive liberals to further incite their audience, so they could push people to protest on the street.

One more note on this about the “poster child” that illegal immigration supporters are using.

Via Jazz Shaw at Hot Air, because he highlights the ridiculousness of this entire fiasco:

Now, however, they seem to have found the ideal star to play the lead in this drama. Guadalupe Garcia de Rayos checks all the right boxes and is now being featured in a nearly continuous loop on cable news. (CNN)

It’s a truly heartwarming story, isn’t it? You guys get it, right? She’s a mom. She has a daughter. She’s been in the country for 22 years trying to make a better life for her family. It’s straight out of a Hallmark movie of the week. Of course you have to sort through a lot of the associated coverage and dig down pretty far to find the pertinent details of the story. It’s true that Garcia de Rayos is a mother and has been raising her daughter in Arizona. It is also true that she has been involved with immigration law enforcement in the past without being deported. What seems to be less frequently mentioned is that she had already been found to have falsely used someone else’s Social Security number. The entire time she has been in the country, she has been living here illegally. If you, assuming you are a legal, American born citizen, were found to be committing identity theft of this type you would quickly find yourself with an appointment to see a judge.

His conclusion gets right to the heart of the matter: “They could have just as easily said, “law enforcement enforces law.” Still, that’s not the story you’re going to be seeing on CNN nor in the pages of the Washington Post. It’s all about the horrible, uncaring nature of the new president and his hateful policies. There was a time in this country when reporting on a story about our laws being enforced would have seemed irrelevant. Sadly, it is now so remarkable as to be front page news.

UPDATE – It is noteworthy that the media has increased its “fake news” since the Obama admin repealed the anti-propaganda ban in 2013, allowing U.S. propaganda to be spoon-fed to Americans.  With Apple’s boss Tim Cook now claiming that “fake news” is killing peoples’ minds and pushing for a campaign against “phony reports,” we see a concentrated effort to stifle Independent Media, while attempting to re-establish the MSM dominace, despite the fake that the majority of “fake” and misleading news has been coming from the MSM itself.

BOTTOM LINE

Rather than attempting to claw their way back to relevance, the MSM has doubled down, some think as a way to punish the populace for ignoring them and refusing to allow them to influence their decisions in the 2016 election, and others like myself, believe it is because they are so liberally predisposed and angry that Trump was elected over their favored candidate, that they would rather see blood in the streets of America over the next four years, than a nation healing.

In their constant attempts to paint President Trump as “dangerous,” they themselves have become the single most dangerous institution in America.

In the news clip below, we hear from an ICE, Field Office Director, that states that 151 of the 160 illegal immigrants arrested had criminal histories, and that about 75 percent had felony convictions and the others had misdemeanor convictions.

 

These before and after photos prove that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton had nothing but love for Islam

Where was the liberal left outrage when Barack and Hillary were bombing the hell out of these three “Muslim” countries?

As the entire liberal left is in a tizzy over Trump’s immigration executive order, which has been cleverly dubbed by the establishment media as a “Muslim ban” (see how Steven Crowder dismantles this word play, fake news propaganda here), we thought it would be fun to showcase three Muslim countries, that under the Obama/Clinton rule, flourished under the inclusive love of the liberal left.

The three countries below are part of the seven countries under US visa moratorium, in accordance with Trump’s executive order.

Actions speak louder than words. If I were Muslim, I would much prefer undergoing extreme vetting under Trump than undergoing extreme bombing under Obama and Clinton.

1. Yemen: American bombs, Saudi bombing.

Yemen, the poorest country in the Middle East was targeted by Obama for daring to move away from Saudi Arabia’s sphere of influence.

cover-yemen-before

Yemen before

2. Libya: Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy masterpiece.

HRC single handedly tore apart the wealthiest country in Africa, violently removing a stable and secular Gaddafi government, in favor of chaos and jihadist extremism.

Libya led to Benghazi. It also gave Obama and Clinton the rat line they needed to move US weapons from Libya, to ISIS and Al Qaeda in Syria.

Libya - Before and After NATO aggression

libya_libya-before-after

libya

Clinton on Gaddafi: “We came, we saw, he died”…

3. Syria: Obama’s “red line” and his “Assad must go” mantra.

Syria’s secular, internationally recognized government under Assad refused to allow an oil and gas pipeline, from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, traverse its territory upwards towards the European market.

For its defiance, Syria paid the ultimate price. Obama’s plan involved giving money, weapons and arms to a jihadist concoction made up of Al Qaeda, Al Nusra, and ISIS invaders, that, in his infinite POTUS wisdom, would do the dirty work of removing Assad, and flipping Syria into a Saudi pseudo state.

destroyedmosque

syria-destroyed

syria-destroyed7

syria

before-after-war-photos-aleppo-syria-fb1__700

 

Exposed: Insider Coup to Sabotage Trump

Coup designed to protect Clintons

Ex-Obama Official Suggests ‘Military Coup’ Against Trump

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump stands at his podium during the Presidential Debate at Hofstra University on September 26, 2016 in Hempstead, New York. The first of four debates for the 2016 Election, three Presidential and one Vice Presidential, is moderated by NBC's Lester Holt. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Aaron Klein

In a blog post for Foreign Policy magazine, Rosa Brooks, a former Obama administration official, outlined four ways to “get rid” of President Trump, including declaring him mentally unfit for command or carrying out a military coup.

Brooks is a Schwartz senior fellow at the New America Foundation, which is funded by billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundations. She served from 2009-2011 as Counselor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and served as a senior adviser at Obama’s State Department.

Her posting is titled “3 Ways to Get Rid of President Trump Before 2020,” although the piece actually outlines four ways.

In what seems to be a deliberate tactic, Brooks repeatedly questions Trump’s mental stability, claiming that the president’s first week in office “has made it all too clear: Yes, he is as crazy as everyone feared.”

Brooks, who is not a mental health professional, offered no evidence for her armchair psychological evaluation other than citing policies that she doesn’t like.

Remember those optimistic pre-inauguration fantasies? I cherished them, too. You know: “Once he’s president, I’m sure he’ll realize it doesn’t really make sense to withdraw from all those treaties.” “Once he’s president, surely he’ll understand that he needs to stop tweeting out those random insults.” “Once he’s president, he’ll have to put aside that ridiculous campaign braggadocio about building a wall along the Mexican border.” And so on.

Nope. In his first week in office, Trump has made it eminently clear that he meant every loopy, appalling word — and then some.

Brooks listed four ways to get rid of a “crummy” president.

  • Elect him out of office after his four-year term. “But after such a catastrophic first week, four years seems like a long time to wait,” she wrote.
  • Impeachment. However, she lamented, “impeachments take time: months, if not longer — even with an enthusiastic Congress. And when you have a lunatic controlling the nuclear codes, even a few months seems like a perilously long time to wait.”
  • Utilizing a claim of mental instability to invoke the 25th Amendment of the Constitution, which sets the path for the commander-in-chief’s removal if the “president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”
  • A military coup. She writes: “The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.”

Regarding her suggested military coup, a creative Brooks proposes preposterous scenarios that she fears Trump might try to play out:

What would top U.S. military leaders do if given an order that struck them as not merely ill-advised, but dangerously unhinged? An order that wasn’t along the lines of “Prepare a plan to invade Iraq if Congress authorizes it based on questionable intelligence,” but “Prepare to invade Mexico tomorrow!” or “Start rounding up Muslim Americans and sending them to Guantánamo!” or “I’m going to teach China a lesson — with nukes!”

When it comes to invoking the 25th Amendment, Brooks argues for appealing to the “ambitions” of Vice President Mike Pence.

That Amendment states:

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

“Surely Pence wants to be president himself one day, right?” Brooks writes. “Pence isn’t exactly a political moderate — he’s been unremittingly hostile to gay rights, he’s a climate change skeptic, etc. — but, unappealing as his politics may be to many Americans, he does not appear to actually be insane. (This is the new threshold for plausibility in American politics: ‘not actually insane.’)”

During the 2016 presidential campaign, opponents of Trump similarly attempted to delegitimize his policies by raising questions about his mental health.  As I wrote at the time, the template for such attacks may have been set more than five decades ago when such claims were deployed against Senator Barry Goldwater during his 1964 presidential campaign, which was widely considered a threat to the political establishment.

That theme has continued into Trump’s first two weeks in office.

Earlier this week, U.S. News and World Report ran a story titled, “Temperament Tantrum: Some say President Donald Trump’s personality isn’t just flawed, it’s dangerous.”

Apparently violating the so-called Goldwater Rule, established by the American Psychiatric Association after similar attacks against Goldwater, the magazine quoted numerous health care professionals attempting to categorize Trump’s mental stability. The APA’s Goldwater Rule forbids psychiatrists from commenting on someone’s mental status unless they first carry out an examination and the doctor is authorized by the patient to speak to the public.

The U.S. News story, for example, quotes John D. Gartner, described as a “practicing psychotherapist who taught psychiatric residents at Johns Hopkins University Medical School” as claiming Trump is “dangerously mentally ill and temperamentally incapable of being president.”

The Independent newspaper this week ran a story that also attempted to diagnose Trump. It was titled, “’Malignant narcisissm’: Donald Trump displays classic traits of mental illness, claim psychologists.” The article similarly cited mental health professionals commenting on Trump’s alleged psychological disorder.

The Independent article partially drew from a New York Daily News story from this week titled, “President Trump exhibits classic signs of mental illness, including ‘malignant narcissism,’ shrinks say.”

“Narcissism impairs his ability to see reality,” Dr. Julie Futrell, a clinical psychologist, told the newspaper while pointing out that she never actually treated Trump.

During Goldwater’s candidacy, the campaign to distort the public’s perception of the politician culminated in an infamous 1964 article in Fact Magazine, which surveyed members of the American Psychiatric Association, or APA, on Goldwater’s mental stability, though none of the psychiatrists had personally examined the presidential candidate.

The New York Times reported on the Goldwater smear:

The survey, highly unscientific even by the standards of the time, was sent to 12,356 psychiatrists, of whom 2,417 responded. The results were published as a special issue: “The Unconscious of a Conservative: A Special Issue on the Mind of Barry Goldwater.”

The psychiatrists’ assessment was brutal. Half of the respondents judged Mr. Goldwater psychologically unfit to be president. They used terms like “megalomaniac,” “paranoid,” and “grossly psychotic,” and some even offered specific diagnoses, including schizophrenia and narcissistic personality disorder.

Only 27 percent of the respondents said Mr. Goldwater was mentally fit, and 23 percent said they didn’t know enough about him to make a judgment.

URGENT! NEW REPORT EXPOSES 6 TOP REPUBLICANS ON SOROS PAYROLL! GUESS WHO’S BEING PAID TO STOP TRUMP?

The Next News Network

https://i0.wp.com/real-agenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/rino.jpg

Published on Feb 2, 2017

Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Lindsey Bruce for Liberty Writers reports, We always knew that there were RINOS in Washington, but Opensecrets.org just revealed that some of those RINOS are actually traitors. Investment Watch: “The non-profit, non-partisan research group based in Washington, D.C., that tracks the effects of money and lobbying on elections and public policy, revealed that while George Soros is responsible for funding Democrats and progressive causes, he has also bankrolled Senator John McCain and a small but select group of other Republicans.

Soros-Funded Groups Behind Effort to Stop Trump’s Border Plan

Trump’s immigration ban no different than Obama’s

Obama Issued Mass Ammo Ban Before Leaving Office

Ban pushed without dialog with industry

Obama Issued Mass Ammo Ban Before Leaving Office

In early December SHTFplan contributor Jeremiah Johnson warned the inauguration was still a long way off and that we should never underestimate a Marxist with an army of oligarchs to lean on.

It turns out that Johnson’s warnings were right on target, as we have learned over the last couple of weeks that President Obama and officials in his administration moved feverishly to implement new rules and regulations with last minute initiatives.

One such regulation, which seemingly disappeared within the hustle and bustle of inauguration day, was a new order issued by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe just 12 hours before our new President was sworn into office.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe, an Obama appointee, ordered a new ammunition ban for certain federal lands on Thursday–his last full day in office.

The ban, which took effect immediately, eliminates the use of lead-based ammunition on federal lands like national parks and wildlife refuges, as well as any other land administered by the Fish and Wildlife Service.The ban is expected to have a major impact on much of the hunting that takes place on federal lands across the United States as lead-based ammunition is widely legal and used throughout the country.

Ashe said the order was necessary to protect wildlife from exposure to lead.

Source: The Free Beacon Via Survival Blog

That may seem like a big win for the anti-gun left, but The National Shooting Sports Foundation has already leapt into action:

“This directive is irresponsible and driven not out of sound science but unchecked politics,” said Lawrence Keane, the group’s senior vice president.

The timing alone is suspect. This directive was published without dialogue with industry, sportsmen, and conservationists. The next director should immediately rescind this and, instead, create policy based upon scientific evidence of population impacts with regard to the use of traditional ammunition.”

As we noted earlier, President Trump has a lot of work to do to reverse the damage caused by the Obama administration.

Reversing this asinine ammunition ban is a good start.