How many times have you been talking to someone, and you know they’re lying, they know they’re lying, and they know that you know they’re lying, but yet they keep lying anyway? What the heck is going on with Democrats these days? It’s been years since they’ve had any sense, but at least they’ve always known how maneuver politically.
Democrats know darn well voter fraud has been rampant over the years (because they’ve made an effort to allow it), the whole country knows it, Democrats know the whole country knows it, and yet they’re still insisting voter fraud is a “myth?” Ok, if voter fraud is a “myth,” then Democrats have nothing to fear from an investigation, and it will be the quickest investigation in history, right? Wrong.
So far, we’ve known since before Election Day (Wikileaks) that Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, was dumb enough to encourage illegal immigrant voting in writing. We know that two nonpartisan groups (VoteFraud.org and watchdog.org) have estimated that Hillary Clinton got between 3-7 million fraudulent votes. This week, a new study by a political scientist from Old Dominion University revealed that approximately 800,000 instances of voter fraud occurred during the 2016 presidential election, of which approximately 81% voted for Hillary Clinton.
Lastly, we also know the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), John Roth, has opened an official investigation into Obama and Jey Johnson using DHS systems to hack various state election systems AFTER everyone had already voted, but BEFORE the votes had been certified!
It’s not that there is no evidence of voter fraud, as the mainstream media would like people to believe. There is plenty of evidence to suggest that voter fraud is a major problem, but the corrupt and dishonest mainstream media refuses to cover it. The video below reviews much of what IS known about voter fraud at this time, and then it makes the case for how Cornell William Brooks, president and CEO of the NAACP, isn’t helping the Democrats by promising to “massively resist” the investigation.
Why the need to massively resist an investigation if you’re not hiding anything? Furthermore, promising to resist blows up the only razor thin rationale the Democrats could have used, saying they were trying to “save the taxpayers” from a costly investigation. Resisting an investigation would cost the taxpayers more… what a fool!